🔗 Share this article

Government closures have become a recurring element of US politics – but the current situation appears especially difficult to resolve due to shifting political forces along with deep-seated animosity between the two parties.

Some government services are temporarily suspended, with approximately 750,000 employees likely to be placed on furlough without pay since both political parties can't agree on a spending bill.

Votes aimed at ending the deadlock have repeatedly failed, and it is hard to see a clear resolution path in this instance because each side – including the President – can see some merit in maintaining their positions.

These are the four ways in which this shutdown distinct currently.

1. For Democrats, it's about Trump – beyond healthcare issues

The Democratic base have insisted for months for their representatives adopt stronger opposition against the current presidency. Well now the party leadership have an opportunity to show their responsiveness.

In March, the Senate's top Democrat was fiercely criticised for helping pass a Republican spending bill thus preventing a government closure early this year. Now he's holding firm.

This presents an opportunity for Democrats to show they can take back certain authority from a presidency that has moved aggressively on its agenda.

Refusing to back the GOP budget proposal comes with political risk that the wider public may become impatient as the dispute drags on and impacts accumulate.

Democratic representatives are using the budget standoff to highlight concerns about ending healthcare financial support together with Republican-approved government healthcare cuts affecting low-income populations, both facing public opposition.

They are also trying to restrict executive utilization of his executive powers to cancel or delay funding authorized legislatively, which he has done in international assistance and various federal programs.

2. For Republicans, they see potential

The President and one of his key officials have made little secret of the fact that they perceive an opening to make more of reductions in government employment implemented during in the Republican's second presidency so far.

The nation's leader personally said last week that the shutdown provided him with an "unprecedented opportunity", adding he intended to reduce funding for "Democrat agencies".

Administration officials stated they would face a "challenging responsibility" of mass lay-offs to keep essential government services operating if the shutdown continued. The Press Secretary described this as "fiscal sanity".

The scope of the potential lay-offs remains unclear, but the White House has been in discussions with federal budget authorities, or OMB, under the leadership of the key official.

The budget director has already announced the suspension of federal funding for Democratic-run parts the opposition party, including New York City and Illinois' largest city.

Third, Trust Is Lacking between both parties

While previous shutdowns typically involved extended negotiations between the two parties aimed at restoring federal operations, there appears to be little of the same spirit for compromise presently.

Conversely, animosity prevails. The bad blood persisted recently, with Republicans and Democrats blaming each other regarding the deadlock's origin.

House Speaker a Republican, accused Democrats with insufficient commitment toward resolution, and maintaining positions over a deal "to get political cover".

Meanwhile, the opposition's chief made similar charges against their counterparts, saying that a Republican promise to discuss healthcare subsidies after operations resume cannot be trusted.

The administration leader personally has inflamed the situation through sharing a computer-created controversial depiction of the Senate leader along with another senior in the House, in which the representative appears wearing traditional headwear and facial hair.

The representative and other Democrats denounced this as discriminatory, which was denied by the Vice-President.

4. The US economy faces vulnerability

Experts project about 40% of government employees – more than 800,000 people – to face furlough due to the shutdown.

That will depress spending – with broader economic consequences, as environmental permitting, patent approvals, interrupted vendor payments along with various forms of government activity tied to business cease functioning.

The closure additionally introduces new uncertainty into an economy currently experiencing disruption from multiple factors including trade measures, earlier cuts to government spending, immigration raids and artificial intelligence.

Analysts estimate potential reduction of as much as 0.2 percentage points from national economic expansion for each week it lasts.

However, economic activity generally rebounds the majority of interrupted operations following resolution, as it would after disruption caused by a natural disaster.

This might explain partially why financial markets has appeared largely unfazed by the current stand-off.

Conversely, experts indicate that if the President carries out his threat of mass firings, the damage could be extended in duration.